• 

  Suit for partition cannot be rejected for not providing the boundaries of the immovable properties over which the partition is claimed. Identity can be verified by the Court. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Exemption of nursery from acquisition. ‘Make believe’ nursery without registration with Indian Horticulture Board cannot be considered for exemption. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’Direction to mutate name of Government in respect of private property, without following due process of law, is illegal’’. Karnataka High Court orders restoration of the owner’s name in the revenue records.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition. Income Tax exemption provided under Section 96 of 2013 Act does not apply to acquisition of land under any other statutes such as the Karnataka Highways Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Excise (General Conditions) Rules. Profit sharing ratio change in a partnership firm by 50% and above amounts to ‘’change of control and management of a firm’’ and attracts payment of transfer fee under the Rules. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’The function of the court ends where the realm of legislature starts’’. Writ Court cannot issue mandamus mandating investigating officer in criminal case to sign on each page of the Court Diary. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  An arbitral award involving monetary claims is a Court decree and cannot be construed to be a movable property to levy stamp duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Stamp Act. Once document is admitted in evidence without objection relating to the deficit stamp duty, objection cannot be raised at a subsequent stage. Remedy is revision before the Court where the appeal lies from the orders passed by the Court. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Unless physical possession of property is taken, the Government would not get the benefit of the savings provision in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Partition. Purchaser of an undivided share cannot claim exclusive share in the joint family properties, seeking allotment of a particular property, without the consent of the other joint family members. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Parallel prosecution. Prosecution under Section 304-A of IPC, while prosecution for the same offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 is initiated, is not permissible. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a registered sale agreement is admitted by the vendor, it is not necessary to examine the witnesses to prove the agreement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal