• 

  Medical Council of India 1956. Issuance of Essentiality Certificate is not just a ministerial act and the State can withdraw such certificate. Supreme Court 24 Feb 2021.

  • 24-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Judicial review of a policy decision and issuance of mandamus to frame policy in a particular manner are absolutely different. Supreme Court refuses to grant additional chance to CSE 2021 candidates citing cascading effect. 24 Feb 2021

  • 24-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal Trial. Wife cannot be dragged into criminal case simply because she is signatory to cheques along with her husband who is involved in illegal business transactions. Such practice should be curtailed. Karnataka High Court.

  • 13-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act 2006. The Facilitation Council has no power to to deal with counter-claims filed against the supplier-contractor. Supreme Court. 22 Feb 2021

  • 22-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal Trial. Circumstantial Evidence. From the falsity of the defence plea and false answers given the Courts can find the missing links to be supplied for completing the chain of incriminating circumstances. Supreme Court. 23 Feb 2021

  • 23-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Income Tax Act 1961. Company ceasing to exist on the day of passing assessment order as a result of its merger under the approved scheme of amalgamation. Assessment order against such non-existent company is invalid. Karnataka High Court. 4 Feb 2021

  • 04-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suraj Lamp and Industries Pvt Ltd vs State of Haryana. Sale of property by unregistered Power of Attorney Will etc to avoid stamp duty. Such transactions are invalid. Supreme Court. 2012-1 SCC-656

  • 11-October-2011
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Clarification regarding unregistered and notarised General Power of Attorneys in the light of Rajni Tandon vs Dulal Ranjan Ghosh Dastidar and Suraj Lamp vs State of Haryana.

  • 23-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Compromise Decree which does not create right in the property for the first time and only recognizes pre-existing right does NOT require registration. Supreme Court. 22 Feb 2021

  • 22-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  IPC. Section 196. Prosecution for offences against the State and criminal conspiracy to commit such offence. Prior sanction of the Government NOT necessary to refer the complaint for investigation. Karnataka High Court

  • 10-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Lakshminarasimhiah and others vs Yalakki Gowda - Temporary Injunction

  • 05-January-1965
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  H.K. Sri Laxmi Manojna Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shrirur Mutt vs H.H. Sri Sujnanendra Thirtha Swamiar - - Temporary Injunction

  • 30-January-1970
  • Daksha Legal