• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Amendment of written statement to add counter claim. A prayer for counter claim or decree cannot be belatedly superadded once the same becomes time barred. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Amendment Act 2020 upheld by the Supreme Court.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Authoritative pronouncement of the Karnataka High Court on the tests of motive eye witness interested witness independent witness unlawful assembly in a criminal trial.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka High Court upholds constitutional validity of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act 2011.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Creating posts having trappings of the Ministers to overcome the upper ceiling limit under Article 164 1-A is ultra vires the constitutional mandate. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Challenge to appointment of M.P. Renukacharya and others as Advisors to Chief Minister. High Court of Karnataka orders notice on the PIL filed by Samaj Parivarthana Samudaya.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Attachment before judgment. The purpose of Order 38 Rule 5 is not to convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt. Any attempt by a plaintiff to utilise the provision as a leverage for coercing the defendant to settle the suit claim

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Order 40 Rule 1. Appointment of a Receiver in pending suit is only on a prima facie finding that the plaintiff has an excellent chance of success in the suit. Supreme Court.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Partnership Act 1932. When there are only two partners on the death of one of them the firm is deemed to be dissolved even though the contract provides otherwise. Supreme Court.

  • 17-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka High Court follows 1948 Privy Council judgment on boundary dispute. The judgment has become Locus Classicus even after seven decades HC

  • 17-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Transfer of case under Section 24. Though balance of convenience of the parties is a relevant consideration in matrimonial matters convenience of the wife is to be preferred. Karnataka High Court.

  • 10-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Bangalore and Mysore Turf Clubs. Staggering revenue loss to Government. Karnataka High Court expresses displeasure at the sad state of affairs.

  • 16-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal