• 

  Property Law. Entries in the revenue records do not confer title to a property nor have any presumptive value on the title. They only enable the persons to pay the land revenue in respect of the land in question. Supreme Court

  • 16-October-2019
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Consumer Protection Act 1986. Consumer forum has no jurisdiction to extend time beyond statutorily prescribed limit of 45 days to file response to complaint. Supreme Court.

  • 11-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for injunction in respect of vacant site. Two persons claim to be in possession of a vacant site. One who is able to establish title will be considered to be in possession as against the person who is not able to establish title. Supreme Court

  • 25-March-2008
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Renouncants married under French Civil Code can not apply for divorce under Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872 or the Special Marriage Act 1954. Only the French Civil Code governs them. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Medical Negligence. A person who does not have knowledge of a particular system of medicine but practises in that system is a quack. It is negligence per se. Supreme Court.

  • 10-May-1996
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Registration Act. Notarised and unregistered power of attorney can be used to act as executant and to present the sale deed for registration on behalf of the owner. Supreme Court.

  • 29-July-2009
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Transfer of Property Act. Gift. Delivery of possession is not a necessary condition for a valid gift.

  • 17-July-0004
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  I.R. Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu

  • 11-January-2007
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Appeal under section 37 would be maintainable against an order refusing to condone delay in filing an application under section 34 to set aside an award. Supreme Court.

  • 11-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Even a blank cheque leaf voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused towards some payment would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Supreme Court.

  • 23-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Income Tax Act. All the Directors of the Company cannot be automatically prosecuted for any violation of the Income Tax Act. There has to be specific allegations made against each of the Directors who is intended to be prosecuted. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Section 138. Accused can be convicted even when the legally enforceable debt is less than the amount mentioned in the cheque. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal