• 

  Power of attorney executed in favour of blood relatives as mentioned in the Karnataka Stamp Act need not be stamped as a document of conveyance. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Residual provision of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be applied to prefer Revision Petition against the order passed by the Karnataka Waqf Tribunal. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cr.P.C. Order of the Magistrate taking cognizance need not be in his own handwriting. It could be computer-printer combination or a typewriter, electronic or otherwise and signed by the Magistrate. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Adverse Possession as Sword. Plea of adverse possession can be raised by the plaintiff by filing a suit for declaration to perfect his title. Karnataka High Court.

  • 01-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Proceedings before the Lok–Adalat are not judicial proceedings. Lok-Adalat cannot entertain applications where Judicial orders are required to be passed. Karnataka High Court.

  • 01-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Anticipatory bail can be granted even after cognizance of an offence is taken and the chargesheet is filed. Karnataka High Court.

  • 01-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Government Tender. Constitutional Court cannot sit in the seat of Tender Scrutiny Committee and go on interfering at every stage of tender. Karnataka High Court.

  • 31-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’Indian parents adopting child in Uganda which is not a signatory to Hague Convention or under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act cannot be rendered remediless’’. Karnataka High Court directs issuance of No Objection Certificate.

  • 01-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cross border adoption of foreign child by Indian parents. Authoritative judgement from the Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-April-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Order 8 Rule 6-A CPC. Counter claim can be filed even after filing the written statement. Restriction is only with respect to the accrual of the cause of action. Supreme Court.

  • 30-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A person who lost his suit for recovery of possession cannot make a plea to be in possession in a subsequent suit in respect of that property. Supreme Court.

  • 30-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Court cannot refer a case relating to non-compoundable offence to Lok Adalat and Lok Adalat has no jurisdiction to determine such case. Karnataka High Court.

  • 28-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal