• 

  Sting Operation and Honey Trapping. Legal position in India. Crime by sting operator does not stand obliterated or extinguished merely because its commission is claimed to be in public interest. Supreme Court. 24 April 2014

  • 24-April-2014
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Audio recording is a document within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act. It has be proved by satisfactory evidence ruling out possibilities of tampering. Supreme Court. 5 February 2010

  • 05-February-2010
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Adultery. Standard of proof is preponderance of probability and not beyond reasonable doubt. It cannot be proved by direct evidence and inference can even be drawn by circumstantial evidence. Karnataka High Court. 25 October 2019

  • 25-October-2019
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Writ Jurisdiction. Petition under Article 226 would NOT lie for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus for tracing missing persons. Only in cases of illegal detention or custody, such writ can be issued. Karnataka High Court. 3 February 2021

  • 03-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. When plaint is returned for want of jurisdiction and re-presented before the proper court, there must be fresh valuation of the subject matter as on the date of re-presentation. Karnataka High Court. 25 March 2021

  • 25-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Minor’s property and minor’s undivided interest in the property. Necessity to obtain court permission - explained.

  • 26-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Action under Section 7 can be initiated by a financial creditor against a corporate debtor concerning guarantee offered by it to a non-corporate principal borrower. Supreme Court. 26 March 2021.

  • 26-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Corporate Law. Legislative history of oppression, mismanagement and unfair prejudice - explained. Supreme Court. 26 March 2021.

  • 26-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Judicial review under Article 226, Constitution of India. Ordinarily the High Court in its jurisdiction under Article 226 would decline to entertain a dispute which arbitrable. Supreme Court. 26 March 2021

  • 26-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  HIndu Minority and Guardianship Act. Section 8. Court permission is required only for the separate or absolute property of the minor and NOT for mniors undivided share in the joint family property. Bombay High Court. 25 November 1999

  • 25-November-1999
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal Procedure Code. Acceptance of B report can NOT be done mechanically without adverting to the material on the basis of which the said report is filed. Karnataka High Court. 9 March 2021

  • 09-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Compromise Decree. A decree founded on a compromise is nothing but a contract with seal of the court superadded. Such decree can be challenged on the grounds on which a contract can be avoided. Karnataka High Court. 4 March 2021

  • 04-March-2021
  • Daksha Legal