• 

  Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Illegality of a trivial nature could not be held to violate the public policy to invalidate arbitration award under Section 34. Supreme Court.

  • 14-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. While refund can be claimed before the Regulatory Authority, adjudging compensation can be done only by the Adjudicating Officer. Supreme Court.

  • 12-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 is retroactive in operation covering all ''ongoing projects'' that commence prior to the Act and in respect to which completion certificate has not been issued. Supreme Court.

  • 12-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In a suit for bare injunction, the trial Court or First Appellate Court is NOT required to give a finding even indirectly touching on title by framing and answering issues relating thereto. Karnataka High Court.

  • 12-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land Acquisition. Time to pass awards in respect of proceedings initiated under 1894 Act, if not passed when 2013 Act came into force, is twelve months from 2013 Act and not two years from Section 6 declaration under the 1894 Act. Supreme Court.

  • 11-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''A total ban on legal mining, apart from giving rise to illegal mining, also causes huge loss to the public exchequer.'' Supreme Court while modifying the order of the National Green Tribunal.

  • 11-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Complaint under Section 138 in the name of the Managing Director followed by Company name is NOT defective especially when he is authorised by a Board resolution to file complaint. Supreme Court.

  • 11-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Political interference in transfers and posting of officers results in politicization of public office which would result in putting public efficiency and good administration to peril. Karnataka High Court.

  • 10-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka High Court upholds Central Government Notification which denies admission to Overseas Citizen of India Cardholders against seats reserved exclusively for Indian citizens.

  • 09-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suits filed after amendment to Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C are governed by the rigour and restriction contained in the proviso, which applies even in the appellate proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 08-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for permanent injunction. Plaintiff admitting possession of the defendant in the plaint itself. Such a plaint is liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule (a) of the Civil Procedure Code. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Citizens have a right to get services from the Government officers in time under the Karnataka Sakaala Services Act, 2011. Karnataka High Court imposes cost for failure of Tahsildar to transfer khata and RTC in time.

  • 05-November-2021
  • Daksha Legal