• 

  Trademarks Act. To get benefit of Section 30, both conditions - honest practice in industrial or commercial matters and absence of unfair advantage or detrimental to trademark must be proved. Supreme Court.

  • 19-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Trademarks Act. Once it is found that defendant’s trademark is identical with plaintiff’s registered trade mark, Court need not enquire as to whether infringement would deceive or cause confusion. Supreme Court.

  • 19-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Summary Suit. Grant of leave to defend with or without conditions is the ordinary rule and denial of leave to defend is an exception. Supreme Court.

  • 18-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Non-impleadment of particular Department in Writ Petition is not a ground for the State Government not to comply with Court order. Karnataka High Court suggests appointment of Nodal Coordinating Officer.

  • 16-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Sambhavami Yuge Yuge''. Court has to act as 'Societal Parent' to protect Dharma as preached by Bhagvan Sri Krishna in Bhagavadgeetha. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service Law. Estoppel. Candidate participating in the selection process can challenge the selection on the ground of illegality since he accepts the prescribed procedure and not the illegality in it. Karnataka High Court.

  • 15-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Frivolous litigation against Azim Premji and Forum Shopping. Karnataka High Court convicts office bearers of India Awake for Transparency for contempt of court.

  • 14-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  SARFAESI Act. Writ petition against action of the private financial institution Assets Reconstructing Company under the Act is NOT maintainable. Supreme Court.

  • 12-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  To combat the social evil, ''dowry'' ought to be ascribed an expansive meaning. Demand for money for construction of a house falls within the definition of the word ''dowry''. Supreme Court

  • 11-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 can not act as a court of first appeal to re-appreciate, reweigh the evidence or facts upon which the determination under challenge is based. Supreme Court.

  • 11-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Prosecution for dishonour of cheque issued towards time barred debt is permissible when cheque was issued under a subsequent written agreement between the parties. Karnataka High Court.

  • 10-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. District court has no jurisdiction to decide child custody issue unless the child resides within its jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 11-January-2022
  • Daksha Legal