• 

  Women are now leading the Defense Forces. Time to change the title from ''Ex-Servicemen'' to ''Ex-Service Personnel". Karnataka High Court calls for gender neutrality in consonance with Article 14.

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  “If marriage does not change the status of son, same cannot change the status of a daughter”. Karnataka High Court strikes down Guideline which excluded married daughter of ex-serviceman for dependent I-card eligibility.

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a single parent applies for passport of the child, consent of the other spouse is not necessary. Passport Manual cannot run contrary to the Passports Rules. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Administrative Law. If a show cause notice is for a particular purpose and the party replies for that particular purpose, the authorities cannot pass order on something more to which the party had no notice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Order rejecting bail petition does not preclude another petition on a later occasion giving more materials, further developments and different considerations. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

  • 04-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Person participating in tender process cannot question the tender conditions being contrary to industry norms. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  SARFAESI Act, 2002. Once the sale deed is executed/confirmation of sale is made in favour of the auction purchaser, the right of the borrower to redeem the mortgage gets extinguished. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When the Bank rejects and cancels One Time Settlement offer, it cannot retain the amount paid under OTS and put the property to sale. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit cannot be dismissed simply because Specified Value as contemplated under the Commercial Courts Act is not mentioned in the plaint. Court can order valuation and return the plaint if the valuation is more than Rs. three lakhs. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Order XVIII Rule 3 of CPC. Rebuttal evidence is permissible only in respect of issues casting onus on the other side and the said opportunity cannot be utilized to fill up the lacuna in the evidence of the party leading evidence first.Karnataka High Court

  • 02-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Public procurement cannot be frustrated due to delay in disposing the appeals by the Appellate Authority. Karnataka High Court stresses the need for speedy disposal.

  • 03-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Association providing recreational activities such as Rummy Card Games, Chess, Carom, Billiards/Snooker and other Skilled games only to its members is not required to obtain license under the Karnataka Police Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal