“Saving Kappathagudda”. Karnataka High Court directs inclusion of the left-out portions of the Kappathagudda Reserve Forest within the area of the Kappathagudda Wildlife Sanctuary.
“Saving Kappathagudda”. Karnataka High Court directs inclusion of the left-out portions of the Kappathagudda Reserve Forest within the area of the Kappathagudda Wildlife Sanctuary.
  • 07-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Inclusion of a professional’s name in a centralized ‘Caution List’ or blacklist by bodies such as the Indian Banks’ Association has serious civil consequences and affects the fundamental right to practice a profession. Such action must comply with principles of natural justice, including a prior show-cause notice and fair hearing. Blacklisting without a speaking order or hearing is arbitrary, violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.
Inclusion of a professional’s name in a centralized ‘Caution List’ or blacklist by bodies such as the Indian Banks’ Association has serious civil consequences and affects the fundamental right to practice a profession. Such action must comply with principles of natural justice, including a prior show-cause notice and fair hearing. Blacklisting without a speaking order or hearing is arbitrary, violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.
  • 07-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. In the absence of any other evidence to demonstrate payment of geni amount, ‘money orders’ by themselves may not be sufficient to establish the relationship of landlord and tenant. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. In the absence of any other evidence to demonstrate payment of geni amount, ‘money orders’ by themselves may not be sufficient to establish the relationship of landlord and tenant. Karnataka High Court.
  • 07-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Writ jurisdiction. The High Court cannot exercise its writ jurisdiction to direct the State to execute a lease for an area beyond the prescribed limit under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, as a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel an authority to perform an act that violates the prevailing law. Karnataka High Court.
Writ jurisdiction. The High Court cannot exercise its writ jurisdiction to direct the State to execute a lease for an area beyond the prescribed limit under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, as a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel an authority to perform an act that violates the prevailing law. Karnataka High Court.
  • 07-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Rights of a stranger purchaser in a partition suit are extremely limited. A purchaser of an undivided share has no independent right to participate in the partition proceedings or to resist the claim of a coparcener, unless a specific plea of collusiveness or fraud is raised and substantiated. Karnataka High Court.
Rights of a stranger purchaser in a partition suit are extremely limited. A purchaser of an undivided share has no independent right to participate in the partition proceedings or to resist the claim of a coparcener, unless a specific plea of collusiveness or fraud is raised and substantiated. Karnataka High Court.
  • 06-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act. Failure to maintain required documentation and operating prohibited machine cannot be termed as mere procedural lapse. Such violation of basic fundamental requisite amounts to dishonest, fraudulent and can be termed intentional. Karnataka High Court refuses to quash criminal proceedings under the Act.
Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act. Failure to maintain required documentation and operating prohibited machine cannot be termed as mere procedural lapse. Such violation of basic fundamental requisite amounts to dishonest, fraudulent and can be termed intentional. Karnataka High Court refuses to quash criminal proceedings under the Act.
  • 05-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. A victim cannot file second appeal against the order of acquittal either under Section 413 or by seeking special leave under Section 419 since affirming order of acquittal by the Appellate Court is final and not subject to review. Karnataka High Court.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. A victim cannot file second appeal against the order of acquittal either under Section 413 or by seeking special leave under Section 419 since affirming order of acquittal by the Appellate Court is final and not subject to review. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. There is no bar to entertain an appeal even after expiry of 180 days. Karnataka High Court.
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. There is no bar to entertain an appeal even after expiry of 180 days. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-March-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article