Mere preferring of an appeal would not, by itself, operate as a stay of the order appealed against. Supreme Court.
Mere preferring of an appeal would not, by itself, operate as a stay of the order appealed against. Supreme Court.
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. The bar under Section 21(3) applies only to delegations made under that Act. Delegations made under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act and the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act cannot be counted for determining the limit of two delegations. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. The bar under Section 21(3) applies only to delegations made under that Act. Delegations made under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act and the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act cannot be counted for determining the limit of two delegations. Karnataka High Court.
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Once parole had been granted and sureties produced to the satisfaction of the court, the non-release becomes illegal detention. Victim of such illegal detention is entitled for compensation. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 157-171
Once parole had been granted and sureties produced to the satisfaction of the court, the non-release becomes illegal detention. Victim of such illegal detention is entitled for compensation. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 157-171
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The removal of a Mathadhipati from the office of the head of a religious institution is not an administrative act of ordinary character. The constitutional guarantee of fairness in procedure, applies with full force to such quasi-judicial proceedings. Supreme Court.
The removal of a Mathadhipati from the office of the head of a religious institution is not an administrative act of ordinary character. The constitutional guarantee of fairness in procedure, applies with full force to such quasi-judicial proceedings. Supreme Court.
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Personal Liberty. Supreme Court mandates pronouncement of orders on bail application at the earliest by the High Courts.
Personal Liberty. Supreme Court mandates pronouncement of orders on bail application at the earliest by the High Courts.
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
When Court refers civil suit for arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the plaintiff is entitled for refund of the Court fee paid. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 211-226
When Court refers civil suit for arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the plaintiff is entitled for refund of the Court fee paid. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 211-226
  • 08-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. A plaint cannot ordinarily be merely on the plea that the suit is barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC. The defence under Order II Rule 2 generally requires examination of causes of action, pleadings and evidence, and therefore cannot usually be decided solely on the averments contained in the plaint. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 136-156
Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. A plaint cannot ordinarily be merely on the plea that the suit is barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC. The defence under Order II Rule 2 generally requires examination of causes of action, pleadings and evidence, and therefore cannot usually be decided solely on the averments contained in the plaint. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 136-156
  • 08-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
When agricultural lands fall within the jurisdiction of the BBMP/GBA, revenue officers have no jurisdiction to initiate actions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Karnataka High Court.
When agricultural lands fall within the jurisdiction of the BBMP/GBA, revenue officers have no jurisdiction to initiate actions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article