Rejection of Plaint. Order II Rule 2 CPC requires comparison of the causes of action in successive suits and may involve examination of evidence, whereas Order VII Rule 11(d) confines the enquiry to the plaint and its accompanying documents. A bar under Order II Rule 2 may result in dismissal of the suit but cannot justify rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d). Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 789.
Rejection of Plaint. Order II Rule 2 CPC requires comparison of the causes of action in successive suits and may involve examination of evidence, whereas Order VII Rule 11(d) confines the enquiry to the plaint and its accompanying documents. A bar under Order II Rule 2 may result in dismissal of the suit but cannot justify rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d). Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 789.
  • 26-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Amendment of Pleadings. Amendment to correct property boundaries may be permitted if it is necessary for resolving the real controversy between the parties and affords the opposite party a fair opportunity to respond, even if sought after the filing of the written statement. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 785
Amendment of Pleadings. Amendment to correct property boundaries may be permitted if it is necessary for resolving the real controversy between the parties and affords the opposite party a fair opportunity to respond, even if sought after the filing of the written statement. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 785
  • 26-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
  • 21-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Civil Procedure Code. Order XIV Rule 6. Though the framing of issues in an ex parte suit is not mandatory, the courts must determine ‘points for determination’, which are like issues, and answer them to resolve the matter of controversy between the parties. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 778.
Civil Procedure Code. Order XIV Rule 6. Though the framing of issues in an ex parte suit is not mandatory, the courts must determine ‘points for determination’, which are like issues, and answer them to resolve the matter of controversy between the parties. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 778.
  • 24-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. A contractual clause merely providing that disputes ‘can be settled by arbitration’ is permissive and does not constitute a binding arbitration agreement, as it neither mandates arbitration nor reflects an unequivocal intention of the parties to submit disputes to arbitration. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 769.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. A contractual clause merely providing that disputes ‘can be settled by arbitration’ is permissive and does not constitute a binding arbitration agreement, as it neither mandates arbitration nor reflects an unequivocal intention of the parties to submit disputes to arbitration. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 769.
  • 24-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Police filing criminal cases against a doctor and social worker who reported the presence of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in Bengaluru. Karnataka High Court quashes the criminal proceedings. Directions issued for the constitution and operationalisation of District-Level Committees to address illegal immigration.
Karnataka Police filing criminal cases against a doctor and social worker who reported the presence of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in Bengaluru. Karnataka High Court quashes the criminal proceedings. Directions issued for the constitution and operationalisation of District-Level Committees to address illegal immigration.
  • 22-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Cyber Crime – Terrorism Threat. Failure of one internet connection does not establish the impossibility of sending an email through alternative means. A false threat of terrorism does not cease to be a criminal offence merely because the accused had no intention of executing the threat. Karnataka High Court permits criminal prosecution of the cyber-crime accused. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1499.
Cyber Crime – Terrorism Threat. Failure of one internet connection does not establish the impossibility of sending an email through alternative means. A false threat of terrorism does not cease to be a criminal offence merely because the accused had no intention of executing the threat. Karnataka High Court permits criminal prosecution of the cyber-crime accused. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1499.
  • 22-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prevention of Corruption Act. Demanding illegal gratification by a public servant is a pure criminal act unconnected to discharge of the official functions or duties. Prior approval under Section 17A is not required for investigating such an act which is unconnected with the recommendation made or decision taken. Supreme Court.
Prevention of Corruption Act. Demanding illegal gratification by a public servant is a pure criminal act unconnected to discharge of the official functions or duties. Prior approval under Section 17A is not required for investigating such an act which is unconnected with the recommendation made or decision taken. Supreme Court.
  • 22-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prospective, Retrospective and Retroactive Application of Laws. Should the Legislature expressly specify the prospective, retrospective or retroactive operation of laws to avoid interpretational disputes, conflicting judicial decisions and needless litigation? Karnataka High Court calls upon the Legislature, Law Commissions, jurists, Bar Councils, legal practitioners and other stakeholders to deliberate and evolve an effective solution.
Prospective, Retrospective and Retroactive Application of Laws. Should the Legislature expressly specify the prospective, retrospective or retroactive operation of laws to avoid interpretational disputes, conflicting judicial decisions and needless litigation? Karnataka High Court calls upon the Legislature, Law Commissions, jurists, Bar Councils, legal practitioners and other stakeholders to deliberate and evolve an effective solution.
  • 21-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article