A court should not vacate an interim injunction at the instance of only some defendants when notices to the remaining defendants are yet to be served. Interim protection should not be dismantled in a piecemeal manner, as it may expose the property to alienation by unserved defendants. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar
A court should not vacate an interim injunction at the instance of only some defendants when notices to the remaining defendants are yet to be served. Interim protection should not be dismantled in a piecemeal manner, as it may expose the property to alienation by unserved defendants. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar
  • 30-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Negotiable Instruments Act. Once a company is ordered to be wound up and an Official Liquidator is appointed, no legal proceedings of any kind, including the proceedings under the NI Act, can be initiated or continued against the company or its management without explicit leave from the court/tribunal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 429
Negotiable Instruments Act. Once a company is ordered to be wound up and an Official Liquidator is appointed, no legal proceedings of any kind, including the proceedings under the NI Act, can be initiated or continued against the company or its management without explicit leave from the court/tribunal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 429
  • 01-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Karnataka Amendment Act to CPC which limits the extension for presenting a written defense to a strict maximum threshold of 120 days and enforces an absolute forfeiture of that right thereafter, is prospective and is applicable only to suits filed after 5.6.2025. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Amendment Act to CPC which limits the extension for presenting a written defense to a strict maximum threshold of 120 days and enforces an absolute forfeiture of that right thereafter, is prospective and is applicable only to suits filed after 5.6.2025. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
RBI’s Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets. The legal validity of a corporate debt resolution strategy is governed by majority-based decision-making, not unanimity. Mere non-participation by a single minority lender in consortium review meetings does not invalidate the resolution process or the resolution plan. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 434.
RBI’s Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets. The legal validity of a corporate debt resolution strategy is governed by majority-based decision-making, not unanimity. Mere non-participation by a single minority lender in consortium review meetings does not invalidate the resolution process or the resolution plan. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 434.
  • 01-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act is a beneficial legislation. The requirement of ‘proper and verifiable proof’ must be applied liberally, particularly where an elderly person or widow produces primary or secondary evidence of the deposit. Karnataka High Court.
The Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act is a beneficial legislation. The requirement of ‘proper and verifiable proof’ must be applied liberally, particularly where an elderly person or widow produces primary or secondary evidence of the deposit. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Civil disputes should not be converted into criminal prosecutions merely to exert pressure on the opposite party. Courts exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC must examine: surrounding circumstances, chronology of events, delay, improvements in allegations, and not merely the wording of the FIR. Supreme Court
Civil disputes should not be converted into criminal prosecutions merely to exert pressure on the opposite party. Courts exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC must examine: surrounding circumstances, chronology of events, delay, improvements in allegations, and not merely the wording of the FIR. Supreme Court
  • 30-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The passing of a final decree or formal disposal of the suit does not extinguish the civil court's jurisdiction to correct accidental slips, clerical or typographical errors, or inadvertent omissions. The power under Section 152 CPC extends to rectifying the mistakes so as to accurately reflect the true intention of the parties in a compromise decree. Karnataka High Court.
The passing of a final decree or formal disposal of the suit does not extinguish the civil court's jurisdiction to correct accidental slips, clerical or typographical errors, or inadvertent omissions. The power under Section 152 CPC extends to rectifying the mistakes so as to accurately reflect the true intention of the parties in a compromise decree. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Temporary Injunction. The object of an interim order is to preserve the subject matter and ensure effective adjudication. In matters involving fire safety and lawful occupation of buildings, public safety overrides commercial interests, justifying an injunction against inducting third parties into the building. Karnataka High Court.
Temporary Injunction. The object of an interim order is to preserve the subject matter and ensure effective adjudication. In matters involving fire safety and lawful occupation of buildings, public safety overrides commercial interests, justifying an injunction against inducting third parties into the building. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article