Fraud vitiates all judicial proceedings. Where a motor accident claim is founded on fabricated evidence, suppression of material facts or false pleadings, the Court is justified in rejecting the claim in its entirety. Karnataka High Court.
Fraud vitiates all judicial proceedings. Where a motor accident claim is founded on fabricated evidence, suppression of material facts or false pleadings, the Court is justified in rejecting the claim in its entirety. Karnataka High Court.
  • 27-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. When agricultural land was under cultivation by the original family member prior to the crucial date, the conferment of occupancy rights in the individual name of a single family member enures to the benefit of the entire joint family. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. When agricultural land was under cultivation by the original family member prior to the crucial date, the conferment of occupancy rights in the individual name of a single family member enures to the benefit of the entire joint family. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Motor Vehicles Act. Income Tax Returns are reliable statutory documents that cannot be disregarded by a Claims Tribunal for assessing the income of a deceased person merely because supporting educational certificates or business licenses were not produced. Karnataka High Court.
Motor Vehicles Act. Income Tax Returns are reliable statutory documents that cannot be disregarded by a Claims Tribunal for assessing the income of a deceased person merely because supporting educational certificates or business licenses were not produced. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. An order of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 16 is ordinarily challengeable only under Section 34 after the final award. The High Court may interfere under Article 227 only upon recording a prima facie finding of a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, after hearing the rival parties. Supreme Court reiterates.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. An order of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 16 is ordinarily challengeable only under Section 34 after the final award. The High Court may interfere under Article 227 only upon recording a prima facie finding of a patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, after hearing the rival parties. Supreme Court reiterates.
  • 28-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Specific performance. Transfer of an undivided share in immovable property is legally valid. Joint ownership alone does not render an agreement to sell suspicious or unenforceable merely because the vendor’s co-sharer/brother was not made a signatory. Supreme Court
Specific performance. Transfer of an undivided share in immovable property is legally valid. Joint ownership alone does not render an agreement to sell suspicious or unenforceable merely because the vendor’s co-sharer/brother was not made a signatory. Supreme Court
  • 28-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
‘’The judiciary commands neither the purse nor the sword’’ However, the Courts are duty-bound to ensure that their injunction orders do not remain mere paper decrees by granting police protection wherever necessary to secure their effective enforcement. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 733
‘’The judiciary commands neither the purse nor the sword’’ However, the Courts are duty-bound to ensure that their injunction orders do not remain mere paper decrees by granting police protection wherever necessary to secure their effective enforcement. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 733
  • 26-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The power to grant police protection is ancillary to the Court's jurisdiction to ensure effective enforcement of a subsisting injunction. Each violation of the injunction order constitutes a fresh cause of action unaffected by the doctrine of res judicata. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 733
The power to grant police protection is ancillary to the Court's jurisdiction to ensure effective enforcement of a subsisting injunction. Each violation of the injunction order constitutes a fresh cause of action unaffected by the doctrine of res judicata. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 733
  • 27-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A person whose complaint prompted the Municipality to initiate proceedings for alleged building violations may be impleaded as an intervenor in proceedings instituted by the building owner, only for the limited purpose of supporting and defending the municipal action. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 728
A person whose complaint prompted the Municipality to initiate proceedings for alleged building violations may be impleaded as an intervenor in proceedings instituted by the building owner, only for the limited purpose of supporting and defending the municipal action. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 728
  • 27-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article