‘’A recruitment scam in a Public Service Commission is not merely a theft of post; it is a theft of equality of opportunity’’. Karnataka High Court constitutes Special Investigation Team to investigate KPSC Veterinary Officer recruitment irregularities.
‘’A recruitment scam in a Public Service Commission is not merely a theft of post; it is a theft of equality of opportunity’’. Karnataka High Court constitutes Special Investigation Team to investigate KPSC Veterinary Officer recruitment irregularities.
  • 05-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The death of a cheque’s drawer before its presentation terminates the mandate to the bank but does not extinguish a civil debt incurred during his lifetime, which may be enforced against his legal representatives to the extent of the inherited estate. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 merely because the cheque was presented after the drawer’s death. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1341
The death of a cheque’s drawer before its presentation terminates the mandate to the bank but does not extinguish a civil debt incurred during his lifetime, which may be enforced against his legal representatives to the extent of the inherited estate. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 merely because the cheque was presented after the drawer’s death. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1341
  • 05-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
‘’No parent is a mere visitor in the child’s life’’. In child custody cases the term ’parenting time’ should replace ‘visitation’ for a non-custodial parent. The expression better recognises the continuing parental relationship and provides a more humane approach to child custody. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1338
‘’No parent is a mere visitor in the child’s life’’. In child custody cases the term ’parenting time’ should replace ‘visitation’ for a non-custodial parent. The expression better recognises the continuing parental relationship and provides a more humane approach to child custody. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1338
  • 05-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Commercial Courts Act – Writ Jurisdiction. An order dismissing the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint would not be amenable to an appeal under Section 13(1A) and can be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 701
Commercial Courts Act – Writ Jurisdiction. An order dismissing the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint would not be amenable to an appeal under Section 13(1A) and can be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 701
  • 03-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Rejection of Plaint. A defendant who fails to invoke Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot seek rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground of an arbitration clause. Karnataka High Court.
Rejection of Plaint. A defendant who fails to invoke Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot seek rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on the ground of an arbitration clause. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Natural Justice – Opportunity of Hearing. Natural justice does not invariably require a separate opportunity to file written submissions or an express consideration of every argument; it is sufficient if the affected party is afforded a real and effective opportunity to present its case. Karnataka High Court.
Natural Justice – Opportunity of Hearing. Natural justice does not invariably require a separate opportunity to file written submissions or an express consideration of every argument; it is sufficient if the affected party is afforded a real and effective opportunity to present its case. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Triple riding on a motorcycle in violation of Section 128 of the Motor Vehicles Act does not, by itself, constitute contributory negligence to absolve the Insurance Company unless it is established that such triple riding contributed either to the occurrence of the accident or to the extent of the injuries sustained by the victim. Karnataka High Court.
Triple riding on a motorcycle in violation of Section 128 of the Motor Vehicles Act does not, by itself, constitute contributory negligence to absolve the Insurance Company unless it is established that such triple riding contributed either to the occurrence of the accident or to the extent of the injuries sustained by the victim. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Procedure to be followed by the Magistrate when a ‘B’ report is filed pursuant to a reference made to the Investigating Officer under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court issues detailed guidelines.
Procedure to be followed by the Magistrate when a ‘B’ report is filed pursuant to a reference made to the Investigating Officer under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court issues detailed guidelines.
  • 02-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article