A void document is void from its inception and does not require any challenge to it as an absolute necessity as the same is just a mere formality. ‘Void’ is ‘Void’ forever and cannot be made valid merely because no challenge is made. Karnataka High Court.
A void document is void from its inception and does not require any challenge to it as an absolute necessity as the same is just a mere formality. ‘Void’ is ‘Void’ forever and cannot be made valid merely because no challenge is made. Karnataka High Court.
  • 16-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Employees’ Compensation Act. The monthly wages of an employee, for the purpose of calculating compensation, cannot be assessed below the amount notified by the Ministry of Labour and Employment. Further, the ‘pay and recover’ principle is applicable to compensation awarded under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Employees’ Compensation Act. The monthly wages of an employee, for the purpose of calculating compensation, cannot be assessed below the amount notified by the Ministry of Labour and Employment. Further, the ‘pay and recover’ principle is applicable to compensation awarded under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 16-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Housing Co-operative Societies. Restrictions on membership under the society’s bye-laws do not invalidate a registered sale deed executed in favour of a nominal or non-member by authorised office-bearers pursuant to a valid board resolution and for lawful consideration. Once title is transferred through a registered sale deed, the vendor cannot unilaterally cancel it. Karnataka High Court.
Housing Co-operative Societies. Restrictions on membership under the society’s bye-laws do not invalidate a registered sale deed executed in favour of a nominal or non-member by authorised office-bearers pursuant to a valid board resolution and for lawful consideration. Once title is transferred through a registered sale deed, the vendor cannot unilaterally cancel it. Karnataka High Court.
  • 17-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Code of Civil Procedure. In a suit instituted by plaintiff, defendant can maintain an application for temporary injunction only under Order XXXIX Rule 1(a) and not under Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) or (c), regardless of whether the cause of action is shared or distinct. To claim such relief, the defendant must file an independent suit. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1457
Code of Civil Procedure. In a suit instituted by plaintiff, defendant can maintain an application for temporary injunction only under Order XXXIX Rule 1(a) and not under Order XXXIX Rule 1(b) or (c), regardless of whether the cause of action is shared or distinct. To claim such relief, the defendant must file an independent suit. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1457
  • 17-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Negotiable Instruments Act. A person who executes a General Power of Attorney in favour of an agent cannot be prosecuted for an offence under Section 138 for cheques issued from the GPA holder’s account, even if the underlying debt arises out of transactions conducted on behalf of the principal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1453
Negotiable Instruments Act. A person who executes a General Power of Attorney in favour of an agent cannot be prosecuted for an offence under Section 138 for cheques issued from the GPA holder’s account, even if the underlying debt arises out of transactions conducted on behalf of the principal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1453
  • 17-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Constitution of India. Reservation. A person entitled to the benefit of affirmative action under Article 16(4) of the Constitution in the Hindu social order ceases to be entitled to such benefit upon conversion to Islam, Christianity or any other religion outside that social order. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 732
Constitution of India. Reservation. A person entitled to the benefit of affirmative action under Article 16(4) of the Constitution in the Hindu social order ceases to be entitled to such benefit upon conversion to Islam, Christianity or any other religion outside that social order. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 732
  • 16-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act. Upon publication of an attachment order under Section 3, the attached properties vest in the Competent Authority, which is empowered under Section 6 to take physical possession thereof without awaiting further orders of the Special Court. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act. Upon publication of an attachment order under Section 3, the attached properties vest in the Competent Authority, which is empowered under Section 6 to take physical possession thereof without awaiting further orders of the Special Court. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal Contempt of Court. Fabrication and production of a forged Power of Attorney, execution of a vakalatnama and filing of objections on behalf of parties without their authority, with a view to manipulating judicial proceedings and securing a favourable order, constitute criminal contempt of court. Karnataka High Court sentences the accused with jail term.
Criminal Contempt of Court. Fabrication and production of a forged Power of Attorney, execution of a vakalatnama and filing of objections on behalf of parties without their authority, with a view to manipulating judicial proceedings and securing a favourable order, constitute criminal contempt of court. Karnataka High Court sentences the accused with jail term.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article