‘’The premature-release process for eligible prisoners must be timely and accountable’’. Supreme Court directs an automated e-Prisons system to prevent administrative delays and ensure automatic consideration of cases according to the applicable remission policies.
‘’The premature-release process for eligible prisoners must be timely and accountable’’. Supreme Court directs an automated e-Prisons system to prevent administrative delays and ensure automatic consideration of cases according to the applicable remission policies.
  • 26-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Section 482 Cr.P.C. Consideration of defence material, including sale deeds or other title documents, would necessarily involve adjudication of disputed questions of fact, which fall squarely within the domain of investigation and, if necessary, trial. The High Court cannot scuttle criminal proceedings by holding a mini-trial. Supreme Court.
Section 482 Cr.P.C. Consideration of defence material, including sale deeds or other title documents, would necessarily involve adjudication of disputed questions of fact, which fall squarely within the domain of investigation and, if necessary, trial. The High Court cannot scuttle criminal proceedings by holding a mini-trial. Supreme Court.
  • 26-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
N. I. Act. When the offence under Section 138 stands established and is upheld, the revisional court cannot show unwarranted lenience by directing the accused to pay only the cheque amount without imposing any penalty or imprisonment. Supreme Court.
N. I. Act. When the offence under Section 138 stands established and is upheld, the revisional court cannot show unwarranted lenience by directing the accused to pay only the cheque amount without imposing any penalty or imprisonment. Supreme Court.
  • 26-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The mere absence of a railway ticket cannot defeat a compensation claim when the claimant establishes bona fide passenger status on the preponderance of probabilities and the Railways fail to rebut that evidence. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 623
The mere absence of a railway ticket cannot defeat a compensation claim when the claimant establishes bona fide passenger status on the preponderance of probabilities and the Railways fail to rebut that evidence. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 623
  • 26-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Section 366 IPC. Where a woman voluntarily accompanies a man to a distant place and stays with him for several nights, such conduct may be relevant in assessing whether the alleged sexual intercourse was without her consent or against her will. Supreme Court.
Section 366 IPC. Where a woman voluntarily accompanies a man to a distant place and stays with him for several nights, such conduct may be relevant in assessing whether the alleged sexual intercourse was without her consent or against her will. Supreme Court.
  • 25-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Where two prosecutions arise from split charge-sheets in respect of the same underlying case, the fact that the sentence in the connected case has already been suspended may be taken into consideration while considering suspension of sentence and grant of bail pending appeal. Supreme Court.
Where two prosecutions arise from split charge-sheets in respect of the same underlying case, the fact that the sentence in the connected case has already been suspended may be taken into consideration while considering suspension of sentence and grant of bail pending appeal. Supreme Court.
  • 25-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Child custody. Mere registration of an offence under the POCSO Act cannot defeat a parent’s legitimate claim to custody or guardianship. The Court must, on the basis of the material available, including the investigation record, form a prima facie view on whether the allegations are baseless. Supreme Court.
Child custody. Mere registration of an offence under the POCSO Act cannot defeat a parent’s legitimate claim to custody or guardianship. The Court must, on the basis of the material available, including the investigation record, form a prima facie view on whether the allegations are baseless. Supreme Court.
  • 25-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A prospective beneficiary under the land acquisition process does not acquire a vested or enforceable right to compel acquisition in its favour on the sole basis of a prior notification or governmental assurance, as the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to supplant or override the statutory scheme governing acquisition. Karnataka High Court.
A prospective beneficiary under the land acquisition process does not acquire a vested or enforceable right to compel acquisition in its favour on the sole basis of a prior notification or governmental assurance, as the doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to supplant or override the statutory scheme governing acquisition. Karnataka High Court.
  • 24-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article