‘’Constitution of India mandates protection of the monuments and places of historic importance from spoilation and disfigurement. Corporations cannot sanction building plan within the prohibited area’’. Karnataka High Court directs issuance of circular barring grant of permission to put up new constructions.
‘’Constitution of India mandates protection of the monuments and places of historic importance from spoilation and disfigurement. Corporations cannot sanction building plan within the prohibited area’’. Karnataka High Court directs issuance of circular barring grant of permission to put up new constructions.
  • 04-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
When a development has been approved under a prevailing Interim Master Plan, the subsequent notification of a final Master Plan that alters the land use designation does not revoke the prior development approval. The validity of the prior approval persists, especially where the developer has acted in accordance with it and third-party rights have been created. Karnataka High Court.
When a development has been approved under a prevailing Interim Master Plan, the subsequent notification of a final Master Plan that alters the land use designation does not revoke the prior development approval. The validity of the prior approval persists, especially where the developer has acted in accordance with it and third-party rights have been created. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Deputy Commissioner cannot reject an application for conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purpose on the ground that the original grantee of the land had violated the conditions of the grant. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Deputy Commissioner cannot reject an application for conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purpose on the ground that the original grantee of the land had violated the conditions of the grant. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Negotiable Instruments Act. Magistrate is duty-bound to first consider the application for condonation of delay, after due notice to the parties, and pass a speaking order before proceeding to record the sworn statement or take cognizance of the offence. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Magistrate is duty-bound to first consider the application for condonation of delay, after due notice to the parties, and pass a speaking order before proceeding to record the sworn statement or take cognizance of the offence. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Once layout plan is sanctioned after verifying water course, pathway etc, Planning Authority must inspect formation of layout as per the sanctioned plan. Karnataka High Court.
Once layout plan is sanctioned after verifying water course, pathway etc, Planning Authority must inspect formation of layout as per the sanctioned plan. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Acquisition under the BDA Act. Land loser can choose compensation in the form of land or site instead of cash anytime before he actually withdraws the cash compensation. Karnataka High Court.
Acquisition under the BDA Act. Land loser can choose compensation in the form of land or site instead of cash anytime before he actually withdraws the cash compensation. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Father-in-law and Brothers-in-law who are enjoying joint family properties are also bound to pay maintenance and provide separate residence to woman. Karnataka High Court.
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Father-in-law and Brothers-in-law who are enjoying joint family properties are also bound to pay maintenance and provide separate residence to woman. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
When suit for specific performance is dismissed and in the absence of prayer against dispossession, defendant/owner has a right to get back possession of the property in accordance with law. Karnataka High Court.
When suit for specific performance is dismissed and in the absence of prayer against dispossession, defendant/owner has a right to get back possession of the property in accordance with law. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-June-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
  • 27-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article