Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. Assistant Commissioner has no power to set aside a document that falls outside Section 23. He can only deal with maintenance claims and declaration of transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances. Karnataka High Court.
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. Assistant Commissioner has no power to set aside a document that falls outside Section 23. He can only deal with maintenance claims and declaration of transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances. Karnataka High Court.
  • 12-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Married daughters are entitled to share in tenanted lands for which occupancy rights were granted to their father, as the grant benefits all legal heirs. The definition of word ‘family’ in Section 2 (12) would not be a bar to claim share in the said property. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Married daughters are entitled to share in tenanted lands for which occupancy rights were granted to their father, as the grant benefits all legal heirs. The definition of word ‘family’ in Section 2 (12) would not be a bar to claim share in the said property. Karnataka High Court.
  • 12-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Employees Compensation Act. Petition for compensation filed by a major brother of the deceased is not maintainable since he is not a ‘dependant’ under Section 2(d) of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Employees Compensation Act. Petition for compensation filed by a major brother of the deceased is not maintainable since he is not a ‘dependant’ under Section 2(d) of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 11-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Police Act. An externment order must follow a structured procedure, which includes serving the person with a written notice of the allegations, granting a reasonable opportunity to respond, and allowing him to engage legal counsel and present witnesses. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Police Act. An externment order must follow a structured procedure, which includes serving the person with a written notice of the allegations, granting a reasonable opportunity to respond, and allowing him to engage legal counsel and present witnesses. Karnataka High Court.
  • 11-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act. A suit to recover payment for work performed for the Panchayat is not barred under Section 295, as the restriction applies only to money lawfully collected by the authority. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act. A suit to recover payment for work performed for the Panchayat is not barred under Section 295, as the restriction applies only to money lawfully collected by the authority. Karnataka High Court.
  • 11-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A subordinate court order based on a submission or concession made by the petitioner's counsel cannot be questioned in a writ petition since the appropriate course is to seek modification of the order before the same court. Karnataka High Court.
A subordinate court order based on a submission or concession made by the petitioner's counsel cannot be questioned in a writ petition since the appropriate course is to seek modification of the order before the same court. Karnataka High Court.
  • 11-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
While an unpaid vendor’s usual remedy is to sue for the sale consideration, if the validity of the instrument is challenged and the transaction is alleged to be voidable on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation, a suit for declaration and cancellation is a recognized course. The existence of such a triable issue justifies the grant of a temporary injunction. Karnataka High Court.
While an unpaid vendor’s usual remedy is to sue for the sale consideration, if the validity of the instrument is challenged and the transaction is alleged to be voidable on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation, a suit for declaration and cancellation is a recognized course. The existence of such a triable issue justifies the grant of a temporary injunction. Karnataka High Court.
  • 11-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A civil court's final judgment on a land title dispute is binding on all parties, including state and revenue authorities. Refusal by the authorities to effect a mutation based on a decree that has attained finality is a defiance of the judicial process. Karnataka High Court.
A civil court's final judgment on a land title dispute is binding on all parties, including state and revenue authorities. Refusal by the authorities to effect a mutation based on a decree that has attained finality is a defiance of the judicial process. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-August-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
  • 27-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article