A mining lease granted in contravention of the mandatory minimum area requirements is void. Such a lease is ineligible for the benefit of ‘deemed extension’ since a statutory legal fiction cannot be invoked to validate or extend an interest that was void at its inception. Karnataka High Court.
A mining lease granted in contravention of the mandatory minimum area requirements is void. Such a lease is ineligible for the benefit of ‘deemed extension’ since a statutory legal fiction cannot be invoked to validate or extend an interest that was void at its inception. Karnataka High Court.
  • 27-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
High Court will not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to grant interim bail solely on the grounds of ‘mercy’ or ‘humanitarian sympathy’ if the arrest proceedings do not depict a blatant non-application of mind or illegality. The proper remedy for such relief lies with the regular bail court. Karnataka High Court.
High Court will not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to grant interim bail solely on the grounds of ‘mercy’ or ‘humanitarian sympathy’ if the arrest proceedings do not depict a blatant non-application of mind or illegality. The proper remedy for such relief lies with the regular bail court. Karnataka High Court.
  • 23-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
In a suit for specific performance, the vendor has to be impleaded as a party in the appeal and on his death, on non-substitution of his heirs /legal representatives, the appeal would abate. Supreme Court.
In a suit for specific performance, the vendor has to be impleaded as a party in the appeal and on his death, on non-substitution of his heirs /legal representatives, the appeal would abate. Supreme Court.
  • 27-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A transferee lis pendens is not a necessary party in a suit for specific performance since such transferee’s title is subservient to the decree that may ultimately be passed in the pending suit. Supreme Court.
A transferee lis pendens is not a necessary party in a suit for specific performance since such transferee’s title is subservient to the decree that may ultimately be passed in the pending suit. Supreme Court.
  • 23-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Vendor is a necessary party in a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale, notwithstanding that vendor has transferred his interest in the subject matter of the agreement to a third party. Supreme Court.
Vendor is a necessary party in a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale, notwithstanding that vendor has transferred his interest in the subject matter of the agreement to a third party. Supreme Court.
  • 27-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Amendment of pleading cannot be refused merely because it seeks to withdraw or explain an admission. Whether such an amendment should be allowed depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, since admissions are not always conclusive and may be erroneous, made bona fide, or of limited relevance to the outcome of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Amendment of pleading cannot be refused merely because it seeks to withdraw or explain an admission. Whether such an amendment should be allowed depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, since admissions are not always conclusive and may be erroneous, made bona fide, or of limited relevance to the outcome of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 23-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The proceedings under the Act would fail only if the proceedings relating to the predicate offence vis-à-vis the accused has resulted in discharge/acquittal or quashment of the predicate offence. In the absence of such termination of the proceedings, there is no bar for continuance of the proceedings under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The proceedings under the Act would fail only if the proceedings relating to the predicate offence vis-à-vis the accused has resulted in discharge/acquittal or quashment of the predicate offence. In the absence of such termination of the proceedings, there is no bar for continuance of the proceedings under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 27-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17, CPC. An application for amendment cannot be dismissed on the ground of delay when the cause of action sought to be introduced is within the period of limitation. Karnataka High Court.
Amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17, CPC. An application for amendment cannot be dismissed on the ground of delay when the cause of action sought to be introduced is within the period of limitation. Karnataka High Court.
  • 22-January-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article