Criminal Law. Separate trials for distinct offenses are not inherently illegal. However, if offenses could've been tried jointly and separation prejudices the accused, a joint trial is warranted. The key factor is whether the separate trial compromised the accused's rights or led to a miscarriage of justice. Karnataka High Court.
Criminal Law. Separate trials for distinct offenses are not inherently illegal. However, if offenses could've been tried jointly and separation prejudices the accused, a joint trial is warranted. The key factor is whether the separate trial compromised the accused's rights or led to a miscarriage of justice. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Bombay Tenancy and Agriculture Lands Act. A subsequent purchaser cannot set up a claim of surrender of tenancy to the landlord in terms of Subsection (3) of Section 5. It is for the landlord to have set up such a surrender and established the same. Karnataka High Court.
Bombay Tenancy and Agriculture Lands Act. A subsequent purchaser cannot set up a claim of surrender of tenancy to the landlord in terms of Subsection (3) of Section 5. It is for the landlord to have set up such a surrender and established the same. Karnataka High Court.
  • 31-March-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
A General Power of Attorney duly executed and notarized carries a presumption of validity under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act. Mere execution of a cancellation deed and its registration under Book IV of the Registration Act does not amount to constructive notice to third parties. Karnataka High Court.
A General Power of Attorney duly executed and notarized carries a presumption of validity under Section 85 of the Indian Evidence Act. Mere execution of a cancellation deed and its registration under Book IV of the Registration Act does not amount to constructive notice to third parties. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Rejection of plaint. Mere suit for declaration without consequent prayer for recovery of possession is not maintainable. Such plaint is liable to be rejected. Karnataka High Court.
Rejection of plaint. Mere suit for declaration without consequent prayer for recovery of possession is not maintainable. Such plaint is liable to be rejected. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
BDA scheme for residential apartments. Purchaser of a residential property is liable to pay GST if booking is made prior to completion of construction. Karnataka High Court.
BDA scheme for residential apartments. Purchaser of a residential property is liable to pay GST if booking is made prior to completion of construction. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Once a property is brought under BBMP limits, the Karnataka Land Revenue Act ceases to apply. Denial of a consolidated Khatha on the ground of non-conversion of the land is not sustainable. Karnataka High Court.
Once a property is brought under BBMP limits, the Karnataka Land Revenue Act ceases to apply. Denial of a consolidated Khatha on the ground of non-conversion of the land is not sustainable. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Commercial Courts Act. Suit for ejection in respect of a commercial premises with prayer for award of mesne profit falls within the jurisdiction of commercial court under Section 2(1)(c)(vii). Karnataka High Court.
Commercial Courts Act. Suit for ejection in respect of a commercial premises with prayer for award of mesne profit falls within the jurisdiction of commercial court under Section 2(1)(c)(vii). Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-March-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prevention of Money Laundering Act. For issuance of summons, the person need not be an accused in the schedule offence as long as the predicate offence is pending in jurisdictional Court for which summoning has been done for recording evidence or production of documents during the course of investigation or proceedings under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act. For issuance of summons, the person need not be an accused in the schedule offence as long as the predicate offence is pending in jurisdictional Court for which summoning has been done for recording evidence or production of documents during the course of investigation or proceedings under the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-March-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
  • 27-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article